Book Reviews Books for Adults

To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis

My in-laws sent me To Say Nothing of the Dog for my birthday last year, along with The Goose Girl, which, as I mentioned before, took me months to read. This one took me over a year to finally get to. Fortunately, our DC trip included several long train/metro/bus rides, so I succeeded in finishing it last weekend.


I’ve been curious about the book since it arrived; the back cover touted it as a “time-traveling book” and, well, I’m a sucker for time travel (except for “The Time Machine” which I found horrendously dull).


Anyway, Ned Henry is a time-traveler in 2057. Time travel was invented in around 2018 by some bad guys (is there any phrase more awesome than “bad guys”? No.) who wanted to go back in time to steal priceless artifacts, bring them back, and sell them. Unfortunately, the net will not allow anything from the past to come back to the present, seeing as it could disrupt the whole time-space continuum, etc. So they sold all their research to historians and philosphers and other folks who are interested in it for less nefarious purposes.


A lady named Lady Schrapnell has gotten her hands on the extensive set of diaries kept by her great-great-great-great grandmother who talked about how she went to Coventry Cathedral, saw the “bishop’s bird stump” (a horrendous Victorian vase ornamented with the most hideous of carvings) and had her life changed. Coventry Cathedral was hit by Nazi bombs in WWII and eventually torn down and turned into a shopping mall when it couldn’t support itself by tourism any longer. Lady Schrapnell, who is disgustingly wealthy, has determined that she will rebuild Coventry Cathedral in the exact location and she wants it as accurate as possible. She begins recruiting time travellers to travel to various different times to see how Coventry Cathedral looked and to note all the details about it so she can have it just right. Ned Henry is one of these time travellers and she’s running him into the ground, having him determine what happened to the Bishop’s Bird Stump (it’s lost and she wants to know when it disappeared or was destroyed).


The book begins with Ned Henry in 1940 with a few other time travellers searching through the bombed ruins of the church for the Bishop’s Bird Stump. They want to see if it was there in the church when it was bombed, but they can’t get to the day of the actual bombing, just a few days after.


The system, of course, is equipped with default protections to keep people from screwing up history. “Slippage” keeps time travellers from going to crisis points where even a small action could majorly revise history. No historian, for example, can get within weeks of the battle of Waterloo. Coventry Cathedral turns out to be a crisis point because the Allies had recently acquired the key to decrypting the Axis codes and if the cathedral had somehow been saved, the Nazis would have realized that their code had been compromised and they might have won the war. So no historians are going to be let in to tamper with anything too near the bombing.


Lady Schrapnell, who thinks “rules are made to be broken,” keeps trying to get the time travelers in there and poor Ned has made 12-14 drops in the last few days. He’s getting severely time-lagged which makes it difficult for him to understand what is being said, makes him wax poetic, and so he needs two weeks of rest.


The head of Time Travel realizes Ned isn’t safe in 2057, because if Lady Schrapnell finds out he’s back, she’ll be sending him on drops without regard for his disorientation. The solution, they decide, is to send him back to the Victorian Era where he can laze about and rest for a few weeks and then return when he’s recovered.


Oh, and by the way? Another time traveller has, for the first time ever, brought something BACK through the net with her. And Ned needs to return it to the Victorian Era before he can get on with his napping. Unfortunately, he’s so disoriented, he can’t understand what it was that was brought back, who he’s supposed to return it to, and where he’s supposed to meet them.


When he does get back to the Victorian Era, he manages to find the fellow time traveller, who turns out to be a spectacularly gorgeous woman named Verity (of course, he can’t tell if she’s really beautiful or if the time-lag is just making him a bit crazy). The object she brought back was a cat which, after she saved it from drowning, followed her back into the net.


Ned came back three days after the cat came throug, though, so Tossie (the great-great-great-great grandmother of Lady Schrapnell) has been looking for her lost cat all this time now. Her journals say she went to Coventry Cathedral in June of that year and she hasn’t gone yet and hasn’t said anything about visiting it, so they need to get her there on some pretense so she can see the Bishop’s Bird Stump, have her life changed, and write about it for Lady Schrapnell to see some 200 years later. Also, they find out she got married that spring to a Mr. C, but they can’t find a “Mr. C” anywhere and then she goes off and gets engaged to the young man that Ned came up the river with (and who he also managed to make miss his meeting with the girl he should have married, according to the church records).


So, Ned and Verity are trying to fix the problems they’ve caused, get Tossie to the cathedral, find Mr. C, all while hopping back and forth between 1880 and 2057 to check their progress. And, of course, it’d be very handy if they could find the Bishop’s Bird Stump, since Lady Schrapnell is still breathing down their necks.


I just scrolled up and was a bit appalled at how long it took me to describe the basic premise of the story. There is a good reason for this – the book is complex. I felt like I was suffering from time-lag the first 50 or 60 pages because I was so unsure of what was actually going on. After those difficult first pages, though, the story really picks up, and I very much enjoyed it. Frankly, though, if it hadn’t been from the Tates’, whose good taste I trust, I probably would have given up, since 50 pages is quite a lot to read before really getting into it.


I thoroughly enjoyed the many references to historical events and famous literature of all eras (although, there were some I had no idea what they were from). The book is just a fun, fun read and I thought the ending was excellent.


Time travel, you’ve not disappointed.

You Might Also Like


  • Reply Terri B. September 26, 2007 at 12:21 am

    This is one of my favorite books. I even went back and read “Three Men in a Boat” by Jerome K. Jerome (book that Willis loosely drew from when writing this one; actually, she drew from the atmosphere rather than the story line per se). I still can’t forget one of her other books “Doomsday Book” which also involves time travel (back to the plague years in Europe). That book is much more serious and linear. It moved me so much that I couldn’t start another book for weeks! She is one heck of a writer.

  • Reply Gretchen September 26, 2007 at 1:33 am

    It’s funny to me that you like time travel books so much. Marshall absolutely detests time travel story lines, and I’m sympathetic to his hate. They always seem sloppy no matter how intricately conceived the plot. It seems like they inevitably miss something or break their own rules. Nonetheless, you’ve done a good job peaking my interest in this book 🙂

  • Reply Karen September 26, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    You know, we might never have read the book if our good friends the Hinckleys hadn’t recommended it. But they did and we thought it quite fun (of course we are suckers for English history–we also love “Three Men in a Boat”). Recently Jane Hinckley finished the latest Jasper Fforde in the nursery rhyme series and really liked it. We haven’t tried that series yet (only the Thursday Next), but I know you have, so you might look for the sequel. Happy reading!

  • Reply allee September 26, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Thanks for the review…I have been looking for something to read! Have you read Michael Crichton’s Timeline? It is one of my favorites.

  • Reply Kristy September 26, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    I love time traveler books, too. One that’s pretty hard to read but very moving (at least to me) was the The Time Traveler’s Wife. Can’t wait to check this one out.

  • Reply Becca September 27, 2007 at 8:05 pm

    Sounds like a fun book. I’ll have to check it out. I generally like all the books you enjoy. You have such good taste!

  • Reply Jen Robinson September 27, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    Hmmm… I wonder if this is where the blogger Lady Schrapnell got her blog name from? Anyway, thanks for the detailed review. I definitely fancy a time travel book from time to time.

    Oh, and thanks for commenting on my blog earlier. I hope that you like The Mysterious Benedict Society. The cover alone is irresistible.

  • Leave a Reply